![]() |
|
||||
|
I liked your short answer - it was most honest. The rest is justification and rationalization, to be quite blunt.
I prefer not to host with a hosting provider that hosts adult content for many personal reasons. Here's my justification/rationalization as to why I choose to still host with gh... I receive the best service, I am able to provide the same for my clients. What I wish: I wish that gh didn't host adult content because from a business owner's perspective (leaving the personal behind) - I lump them all up in the same category as I do the spammers and email miners. I don't like receiving crap from sites/people I didn't subscribe to nor am interested in. And... if I could charge them for the time I take to remove their sh*t from my forums/emails/etc. I would. Last edited by rlhanson; 05-16-2008 at 02:21 PM. Reason: can't spell |
|
||||
|
The thing is though, if you really look at the spam and posts that wind up on the forums, it is increasingly rare that adult is what is making up the majority of the clutter. You'll notice that 99% of the crap that comes in is for pills, fake watches, cracked software, and all sorts of other things being peddled by non-legitimate businesses.
I can't think of the last piece of junkmail that I received from an adult site but then I could just be lucky. I think adult webmasters have become more responsible over the years because they have realized spamming and "popup hell" are sure ways to get shut off by their web hosting provider and when that happens, they no longer make money from their sites. The real damage and detriment to the Internet is coming from the spammers, scammers, phishers, and online pharmacies out there. Unlike adult, the things I just listed is the stuff you don't have a choice about looking at because it winds up in your inbox every single day.
__________________
::::: 01001100 00110011 00110011 00110111 |
|
||||
|
You have a good argument for sure with what has been ending up in my inbox (and my client's inbox) everyday.
Professionally, it really is dependent on whether your willing to take their money, and where you draw the line. I'm glad GH will not allow the spamming like other hosts do and I am thankful that GH has the integrity it does when conducting business. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Naked ladies are here and will remain here. Your religion, fashionable clothes, oppinions and personal reasons will form and shatter a thousand times, along with everyone else's. Naked ladies will still be here.
__________________
Matt-agreated analyser. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
I don't I feel the need to castrate men or horses to exercise my right to personal or professional preferences. But thanks for your input anyway. Last edited by rlhanson; 05-22-2008 at 02:34 PM. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
In which case, if ISP's actually applied your POV above, you'd be without a host. Altogether a very dazzling series of posts you've made so far.
__________________
Matt-agreated analyser. |
|
||||
|
While I don't exactly agree in the way which the argument was presented by andreadoria, it is certainly is an interesting concept.
I am glad that we do not have to be the Internet Police for sites that allow public interaction because we would also have the be the Judge and Executioner when it came time for us to decide if something was "adult" in nature and I cannot imagine the blow-back we would get if we started arbitrarily shutting down peoples forums, blogs, etcetera that are non-adult by nature, but happen to have adult content on them by due to the interactions performed by members of the general public. As for John-Marc's horse comment, I don't see the what relevance it has on this thread. Lets keep it friendly boys and girls.
__________________
::::: 01001100 00110011 00110011 00110111 Last edited by Matt; 05-22-2008 at 04:26 PM. |